CQAR Guide
How CQAR Works
A full tour of the product — every layer, every signal, and how a graded shortlist actually gets built.
One platform, two assessment layers
CQAR combines structured Screening with an adaptive AI voice interview. You decide which mix fits each role.
- Screening. Fixed voice questions scored against the role's rubric. Built to filter at scale.
- Adaptive Interview. A dynamic, spoken interview that follows up on vague answers and reads behavioural signals.
- Per role, you pick Screening only, an Adaptive Interview only, or both — the pipeline columns adapt to match.
The pipeline adapts to the role
Kanban columns shift based on the role's product type so the team only sees stages that matter.
- Adaptive Interview only: Applied → Interview → Offer → Hired.
- Screening only: Applied → Screening → Assessment → Offer → Hired.
- Both: Applied → Screening → Assessment → Interview → Offer → Hired.
- System-driven stages fill from candidate actions. HR-driven stages advance by drag-and-drop.
- A screening-only candidate worth a deeper look can be promoted with Move to Interview — straight into an interview-enabled role, keeping what they've already completed.
Adaptive interview, in real time
The AI listens, transcribes, and picks the next question based on what the candidate just said.
"Walk me through how you'd debug a slow database query at 3 a.m. on call."
- Each turn updates pace, clarity, sentiment, and confidence scores.
- Vague or surface-level answers trigger probing follow-ups.
- Audio is deleted as soon as the session ends — only the transcript and scores are retained.
Grades you can defend
Every candidate gets a composite grade A+ through D, with X for the lowest band or an incomplete/insufficient assessment.
- A+ / A — Outstanding or excellent fit across all evaluated dimensions.
- B — Strong; meets the criteria with minor gaps.
- C — Moderate; partial match with notable gaps.
- D — Below standard for key criteria.
- X — the lowest band, or an interview that wasn't completed / had insufficient data.
- Each grade is backed by Technical Fit, Soft Skills, and Resume Match sub-scores.
Six soft-skill dimensions
Soft skills get treated with the same rigour as technical fit — each candidate scored across six categories.
- Professional Competencies — domain command, judgement under pressure, autonomy.
- Work Style & Ethics — work habits, time management, accountability, professional ethics.
- Personality Compatibility — alignment with team dynamics against the personality dimensions set per role.
- Career & Growth Orientation — appetite for development and long-term career aspirations.
- Stress & Pressure Management — composure under pressure, handling probes, recovering in real time.
- Cultural & Organizational Fit — alignment with company values, collaboration, autonomy, ownership.
Triangulated scoring
Every grade is corroborated by three independent signals — not a single opaque number.
- Rubric match — answer compared point-by-point with the role's stated criteria.
- Resume signal — claimed experience cross-referenced with what the candidate actually demonstrates in the interview.
- Behavioural read — pace, hedging, specificity, recovery — derived from the live transcript.
- When all three agree, confidence is high. When they disagree, the report flags the conflict for human review.
Side-by-side comparison
Shortlist 2 to 6 candidates and CQAR overlays their per-metric scores so the call is data-driven.
- On the Candidates tab, tick 2–6 candidates — from any role — and click Compare. On the pipeline board, Shift+click cards does the same.
- Toggle between Head-to-head (top pick, biggest differences, what each brings) and Radar view (overlay chart).
- The current leader and the dimensions where candidates differ most are called out automatically.
- Open any candidate's report from the comparison to drill in without losing context.
Evidence & transparency
Every grade ships with the moment it came from. No black box, no 'trust me'.
- Each soft-skill score links to the transcript moment that earned it.
- Each criterion grade cites the candidate's exact words that satisfied or failed the rubric.
- The recruiter makes the final hiring decision — every CQAR score is decision support shown with the evidence behind it, never an automated verdict.
- Candidates can request their own transcript through the recruiting team.
Compliance, built in
CQAR is designed for jurisdictions that regulate AI-driven hiring — disclosure, consent, and audit logs are first-class.
- NYC Local Law 144 — informed-participation screen before any candidate assessment, with the acceptance logged.
- GDPR-aligned retention — audio is deleted as soon as the session ends; other assessment data is purged after a default 14-day window (custom retention windows by arrangement).
- No PII in AI prompts — identifying fields are stripped before the model evaluates a response.
- Defensible evidence — every score links to the candidate's exact words and the rubric it was measured against, so any decision can be explained and reviewed.
Audit trail
Every stage transition, score event, and consent action is logged, so a compliance review is a query, not a project.
- The
pipeline_eventslog captures actor, timestamp, before/after state, and reason for each change. - Score events tie a candidate's grade to the exact rubric version that produced it — re-grading after a rubric change is explicit, never silent.
- Consent and disclosure acceptances are stored with the exact text the candidate accepted.
- Recording and decision activity is logged for your team's review.
Bias mitigation
Every candidate gets the same screening rubric. The adaptive interview adapts the questions, not the scoring axes.
- Identical rubric per role — fairness is enforced at the scoring layer, not the question layer.
- PII stripped pre-evaluation — name, gender markers, accent labels, and ethnicity cues are never seen by the grading model.
- Same questions, same order — in screening, every candidate is measured on the identical rubric; only the adaptive interview's follow-ups vary.
- The recruiter makes the final call — CQAR augments your judgement, never replaces it.
One product. Many candidates. One decision per role.
CQAR augments your judgment with evidence. The human always has the final word.
Ready to start? See the Recruiter Onboarding guide for the full hands-on walk-through, or send candidates to the Candidate Guide before they take the assessment.